Thursday, January 9, 2014

30 Random Thoughts While Scanning 30 Years of Negatives




  • ·           I'll never finish - scanning is so slow. 
  •         I should have done this sooner.  I could have shared more of my life with my children.

  • ·            Did I know how to focus?  I missed focus on many shots that autofocus has made easy.  On the other hand, I'm impressed with focus on some action shots that I nailed.

  • ·            I made a lot of the same mistakes on the same roll.  I didn't know that my exposure was wrong until my film was processed.

  • ·          Why didn't I take more photos?  I wish I had more of so many things. 
  •              I miss so many people.
           
  •            Everyone was so young
           
  •            Dust Dust Dust  Dust was everywhere.
            
  •            Dust has changed color.  It's black now when dust is on the sensor.  It was white then on my prints.
           
  •           How could the photo labs scratch so many negatives?
          
  •             I can't pick the peak of action from several shots with film.  I only had one chance to get it.
           
  •            I didn't worry about using out of date film - I should have.
             
  •       Why did I take so many photos of cats?
           
  •           The Lab covered many mistakes.  I was under the impression that overexposing negative film resulted in finer grain.  It may have but the dynamic range isn't as good.
           
  •             I like the way film handled fine details.  With digital, the detail is there or not. Film leaves a hint of detail.  An example is a scene where distant tree branches meet the sky.  It looks more natural with  film
             
  •       Most people wore funny clothes and drove classic cars.
          
  •            I use out of focus areas in my composition now.  We didn't have bokah back then.
           
  •           I should have spent more on lens.  
           
  •           Some creative things I did are no longer creative when everyone can do them in Photoshop.
           
  •            I thought I was a good photographer then.  Most of my scenic and nature photos aren't worth the time it takes to scan.
          
  •            It is hard to preview images.  I need a 10x loupe and a light table and need to look at each one.  Now I see everything on my huge screen and see tiny flaws immediately.
            
  •            People look very happy with their ex-wives and husbands.
           
  •          I have photos of people I had completely forgotten.
           
  •         I have photos that I don't remember taking.
           
  •           I have photos that I didn't want to remember taking.  I had to quit scanning for a while after I saw a photo appear on my screen of my wife and daughters funeral.
           
  •            Some negatives are impossible to color balance.  I don't know if the negative faded or the film processing was bad.
          
  •           My medium format shots are nice, but I can do better with 35mm today.
             
  •       I wish I had taken more shots of the everyday things.
           
  •           Some of the real old people I photographed were younger than I am.
           
  •           I wonder if I'm wasting my time.  Some of my negatives are 40 years old.  I'm not sure that any of my digital images will be around in 40 years.  It only takes one delete and they are gone.

Sell Adobe - This Will be a Nasty Divorce


It was a marriage made in heaven.  I purchased Photoshop shortly after switching to digital photography.  I had never paid so much for software before but Adobe had a winner.  About once a year, Adobe would release a new version with marvelous new features.  I willingly upgraded each time up to Photoshop 7.

Adobe never released Photoshop 8.  They announced Photoshop CS instead.  They started breaking the software into modules that interacted with each other.  They split Photoshop into two versions - the extended version was more expensive.  It sounded great in their press releases but it made my workflow more complicated.  Instead of working for me the software started working against me.  Since couldn't move to the extended version as an upgrade, Photoshop CS was a watered down version of Photoshop.

About the time of Photoshop CS2, things got worse.  Adobe announced a new file format - DNG.  They said that the time would come when they would no longer support older versions of file formats.  They provided a DNG converter free of charge.  Once we had modified our files to their format, we would always be able to work with them.  They were doing this as a favor.  Adobe also provided Camera Raw and soon you had to buy the most recent version of Photoshop if you wanted to be able to use the latest camera models.  They effectively cut out the past and future for those who didn't upgrade.

I did like one of the new modules that Adobe developed - Lightroom.  I started using it with Lightroom 2.  I found that I needed to use Photoshop less as I started using Lightroom more.  I liked Lightroom so much that I decided not to purchase Photoshop CS5.  Adobe had only made minor changes and I didn't have a new camera.  This strategy worked for almost a year.  About the time I was expecting Photoshop CS6 to be released, Adobe announced that only users of CS5 would be able to upgrade.  They offered a small discount for Photoshop CS5.  I purchased the Photoshop CS5 upgrade before their deadline.  The extortion had worked for Adobe and their profits went up. 

Photoshop CS6 didn't have any new features that I was excited about, but I had learned my lesson.  I went to Amazon to purchase it and found out that it wasn't there.  Adobe now was only selling it through their own site.  They didn't even want to provide a CD with the purchase. 

Photoshop CC was announced in June.  I had learned that when Adobe changes the name, bad things happened but I wasn't prepared for this one.  Adobe had another new rule.  They wanted me to pay a monthly fee to use photoshop whether they had improved it or not.  They were also now selling space on the "cloud" so that I could start paying a monthly charge for my files as well.  This was the breaking point for me.  I decided to continue to use Lightroom and my Photoshop CS6 would have to do until I absolutely needed to move to something new.

Apparently many others felt the same way, and Adobe offered a "deal".  I could subscribe for 10 dollars a month and would receive Photoshop CC as well as Lightroom if I was a current user of CS6 and met a deadline date.  This deal is good as long as I maintain my subscription although the fine print doesn't say  exactly the same thing that Adobe is promising.  I need to trust them. 

I swallowed my pride and signed up.  Adobe promptly allowed hackers to download all of their credit card subscribers information. 

Apparently Adobe isn't telling its stockholders the same thing that its telling its users.  Today I read:
"The quicker transition to subscriptions has a shorter-term downside: because customers pay smaller fees steadily over a long period of time instead of a large sum at the beginning of a purchase, revenues drop when the subscriptions begin. That's true of  Adobe, and it's complicated by the fact that it offered promotions to encourage people to make the change.
For example, earlier Creative Suite customers can spend $30 a month instead of $50 for    their first year for the full CC subscription to all Adobe's software, and the company also has a limited-term $10-per-month Photoshop Photography Program option that gives   access to Photoshop, Lightroom, cloud storage, and access to the Behance professional network. "
Adobe is telling its stockholders that everyone loves the new model and to expect massive increases in profit in future years.  

Adobe should tell its stockholders that it is out of ideas and now needs to rely on extortion and vague promises to maintain its user base.  It has become a commodity - a monthly bill like a leased car.  Nearly everyone who wants Photoshop has it.  The only way to increase prices is to charge more or to offer something better.  Adobe is looking at strike 3 with many of its most loyal users - including myself.    If someone else starts to market a similar product, I'm ready to leave.   If you own Adobe stock, I wouldn't count on Photoshop to increase future profits.  The band may be playing but the ship is going down.